Are you wondering which meat chicken breed you should raise, Cornish Cross or Freedom Ranger?
There is an increasing selection of meat chicken breeds available to the consumer these days, not to mention the option of raising larger, traditional, dual-purpose, laying hens. The two most popular choices right now are the white Cornish Cross and the Freedom Ranger Broiler.
The two breeds have some differences which may make one more suited to your homestead than the other. Let’s explore those contrasts so you can make the decision that works best for you!
Cornish Cross or Freedom Ranger? Which Meat Chicken Breed Should You Choose?
Cornish Cross Breed Characteristics
- Average Time to Raise: 8 weeks
- Average Weight at Harvest: 4 pounds
Cornish Cross are found with a few variations to their name but are generally a heavy-bodied white chicken. Cornish chickens are bred with large breast meat in mind for consumers looking for low-fat protein.
They are typically inactive and if you’ve only raised laying hens in the past you may be surprised at how they really don’t behave very much like a chicken. They basically spend their lives eating, drinking, sleeping, and defecating.
It’s a personality well-suited to bulking up quickly.
“These broiler chickens are known for their remarkable, rapid growth and feed efficiency. Whether you are looking to raise these top-selling meat birds for your own pleasure, or to raise and sell, you won’t find better.
Females will have a fine, smooth finish when dressed and reach beautiful roasting size. Buying straight run chicks gives you some of each sex so that you can take advantage of the strong points both ways. Males will dress from three to four pounds in six to eight weeks, and females will take about one and a half weeks longer to reach the same size.”
McMurray Hatchery
Benefits of Raising the Cornish Cross Meat Chicken Breed
Quicker to Raise
Many find that you can raise Cornish Cross to butcher weight more quickly than other breeds. They seem to get to the 4-6 pound finishing range within 2 months of age. Afterward, their growth rate seems to slow down… if you want to risk raising them longer for a larger carcass.
Easier to Butcher
The internal organs in this breed are easier to remove and because they spend so much time laying down, feathers often don’t grow on their breast. This means there are fewer feathers to remove at butchering time.
Later Maturity
Unlike Ranger Broilers, Cornish Cross will not reach maturity before butchering so the roosters won’t crow or act aggressively towards the females.
Less Expensive to Raise
There is a higher demand for Cornish Cross chicks which lowers the cost of day-old chicks. Because they are also an inactive breed that reaches a finishing size more quickly, Cornish Cross have a higher feed conversion and are less expensive to raise.
Cons of Cornish Cross
Pasture Raised
If you are interested in maximizing the health benefits of pasture-raised meat chickens, Cornish Cross may not be the breed you’re looking for. They rarely forage for bugs and greens, preferring to hang out around the feed trough and waterer.
Health Issues
For a variety of reasons, the Cornish Cross are prone to have more health issues compared to other breeds. They are notorious for heart failure and broken legs, especially as they near maturity. They have also been known to experience rectal prolapse. Unfortunately, these types of health issues are experienced later in the bird’s short lives… which means the bulk of your investment in raising them has already been made.
Freedom Ranger Broiler Breed Characteristics
- Average Time to Raise: 11 weeks
- Average Weight at Harvest: 6 pounds
Freedom Rangers are also hybrid chickens that fall under a variety of monickers. Generally, you’ll find the term “Ranger” in the name though. They are much more active, healthy birds and behave more like what you’d expect from a chicken. They will run around, chase bugs, pick at grass, and roost instead of parking themselves at the feed trough all day. Their leg bones are stronger to support their body weight and, as a result, you’ll find they have an increased yield of dark meat.
“Freedom Ranger chicks grow at a moderate rate, reaching their peak weight of 5-6 lbs in 9 to 11 weeks. These active, robust chicks are suitable for free range, foraging and pasture environments and produce tender, succulent meat with more yellow omega 3 fat and less saturated fat than fast growing breeds.
Our Freedom Ranger chickens feature either red or tri-colored feathers and have yellow shanks, skin and beaks. They are an active breed and thrive when allowed to free range, scratch and dust bathe in natural sunlight.”
Freedom Ranger Hatchery
Benefits of Raising Freedom Ranger Broilers
Pasture Raising
This is one of the greatest benefits of raising Ranger Broilers. When raised on pasture they will forage well, diversifying their diet and increasing the flavor and most likely nutrition of the meat through the addition of greens, bugs, and whatever else chickens love to find and eat while scratching around.
While Rangers do have a more varied diet, it is not a significant enough consumption to offset production feed costs to help you save money once you factor in the longer time to reach harvest weight.
Fewer Health Issues
Freedom Ranger Broilers typically do not experience the health problems that the Cornish breed is prone to suffer from. This is well worth noting since those health issues often occur after the majority of the investment has been made in the bird.
Higher Dark Meat Ratio
Because their legs are bred to be sturdier to support their heavy weight, they are larger and have a higher ratio of dark meat. Your preference for dark meat will determine if this is a pro or a con. I place it in the pro column because the moist flavorful dark meat is my favorite!
Richer Flavor
The flavor of Freedom Ranger meat is somewhat richer than Cornish Cross, especially the dark meat. You may find the meat to be juicier and the texture slightly more firm. (Which is not a hard feat to accomplish since Cornish Cross breast meat is almost sawdusty in texture. )
Live Longer
Because they don’t experience health issues, Freedom Rangers can live much longer than Cornish Cross. We have kept one alive and healthy for 3 years.
Can Lay Eggs
A Ranger hen can be kept for laying, but they are not highly productive. They lay a large pointy egg about 3 times a week for about 2 years.
It’s a shame that they are a hybrid cross because you can’t hatch out those eggs for continuous self-sufficient meat production. Chicks hatched from Ranger broilers won’t turn out with the same characteristics as their parents and may not make a great meat bird.
Cons of Freedom Ranger Meat Chicken Breed
Longer to Raise
The growth rate of the Ranger meat chicken breeds is slower than their Cornish counterpart. It seems the Cornish achieve the 4-6 pound target range more quickly before slowing off their growth rate. But Rangers seem to take the same length of time to reach a larger carcass weight (we prefer the 7-pound range). Both breeds get to that weight in about 14 weeks or so in our experience.
More Difficult to Butcher
The difference is really negligible and if you haven’t butchered Cornish you may never notice, but the internal organs in a Ranger are a little more trouble to remove. They are also more fully feathered than Cornish and therefore require more work at plucking time. If you have a plucker, this isn’t an issue at all.
If you take your chickens to a butcher to be processed, they may charge a higher fee per bird (usually less than a dollar each) in order to accommodate the additional work removing feathers.
More Expensive to Raise
Because of the longer time it takes to raise them, Rangers can be more expensive. This is a difficult variable to determine because it depends on many factors besides feed conversion, such as health issues.
Can Be Aggressive
Because they reach maturity more quickly, Rangers may become aggressive. This is usually only an issue if you raise a straight-run flock. With all males, they will do the squeaky teenage chicken crow, but won’t run around and chase each other the way they do when the ladies are around. We have never once had them turn that aggression toward people, including our children.
We’ve been raising meat chickens for our family for over a decade now. We’ve experienced raising both meat chicken breeds many times and have done extensive comparisons of their health, hardiness, longevity, costs, and flavor. Ultimately the choice as to which breed to raise comes down to your needs, homestead set-up, size requirements, and flavor preference. Part of the homesteading adventure is having fun and experimenting to discover which breed works best for you! So now that you know what to expect, try raising both breeds and learn which you prefer to raise on your homestead.
About the Author
Quinn and her family have been homesteading in Ohio for over 17 years, many of which she spent sharing their experiences and encouraging other homesteaders at Reformation Acres until 2018. Besides raising their main crop of 8 children, Quill Haven Farm revolves around the Queen of the Homestead, the family milk cow. In addition to cheesemaking and other home dairy, the cow also provides skim milk to fatten a few hogs every year, raise up a beef calf, supplement the feed for their flock of laying hens & broilers, and beautiful compost for their 14,000 square feet of organic gardens. You can find her writing these days on her Substack- https://www.quillhavenfarm.com
More About Raising Chickens
Whether you’ll be free-ranging them or not, keep reading for more information about raising the healthiest and happiest backyard chickens on your homestead!
- All About Cardboard Bedding in the Chicken Coop
- 5 Reasons to Raise Pastured Livestock
- Why You Need a Rooster
- How to Keep Chickens Warm in the Winter
- How to Treat Common Chicken Illnesses
- 10 Ways to Help Chickens Beat the Heat
- Chicken Breeds for Colorful Eggs
- Cornish Cross vs. Freedom Ranger: Which Meat Chicken Breed Should You Choose?
- Heritage Meat Chicken Breeds
- 10 Dual-Purpose Chicken Breeds
A good article, but I saw no mention of animal welfare issues. Cornish cross, with their various health problems, are likelier to suffer chronic and/or acute pain in their short lives. To me, that is an issue worth considering.
I just raised cornish cross and followed the recommendation to feed them 12 hours a day. I removed their food every night after they were one week old. I had no health problems. I do enjoy the flavor of the Ranger though. I favor a more natural bird. (The only reason I had the Cornish Cross was that the Rangers were sold out by the time I went to purchase them.)
I live at 8,000′. The Cornish Cross birds we have tried to raise have invariably died very early (5-6 weeks): either their hearts give out, or their legs do. We rely on a sloped pasture for them to range, and they just can’t do it. The Freedom Rangers do great, though, and we think the meat has more taste, less fat. No health issues. They also seem very alert to predators.
I have to take issue with the stereotypical description of the White Rock breed. I have raised these birds (pullets) for a good many years and feel the welfare impact is understated in the article. This is the commercial breed designed for a seven week intensive rearing cycle. Given unlimited feed and a poor, overcrowded and boring environment, the development and health issues may well be as described. Since the article is “homesteaders” I have to assume that welfare is a higher bar to maintain?
Our cycle of 25 birds is usually around 12-13 weeks and the feed is rationed with three feed points. The birds have access to a contained outside run during daylight hours. Perches provided inside the coop and also outside are well used, especially after the last feed of the day and into the dusk hours. The feed is a starter of Golden Harvest (KRUM – grower) and is non-medicated, switching to a non-GMO grower after 75kg of the former. Water is available both inside and outside. The ‘green diet’ is supplemented using surplus from the vegetable garden – Swiss Chard, Kale etc.
This year we have 6 Rustic Rangers and 21 White Rocks. Behaviourally speaking they are acting out the same. The RR being a little less inclined to be handled without complaint. They dry dust together and feed cooperatively at the three stations – this is about four weeks in since day olds.
Body mass is already differentiated and I have no doubt the RR will take a little longer to finish but we have seen no mortality in either which is the norm here.
When processing, the WR is subject to leg fracture if handled badly and I have seen one or two cases of ‘green muscle’. Dressed weights for the WR is usually a solid average of 8 pounds with the ‘deboned saddle’ weighing in at around 3 pounds. I’m interested to compare the RR when their time comes due.
Check them out here –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_yujOXe8-k
I realise that our process cannot be replicated in a commercial setting and that ‘cheap food’ is the imperative. My philosophy though is about a healthy diet where the production methods respect the welfare in what remains a fairly short life.
Hi David, Thank you for sharing your experiences with us! That’s definitely one of the problems with making generalizations about breeds. Experiences vary based on numerous factors, but generalizations do give folks an idea of what to expect when raising various breeds and that is the aim here.
This article was written based on my experiences with both broiler chicken breeds, raised utilizing pasture rotation and over 16 years of backyard homesteading on 3 homesteads in Ohio. I also took into account my interactions with the online homesteading community for the past 10 years. Last year in particular, I knew people all over North America that were losing their cornish cross broilers to prolapse. On my farm, with the mix of both breeds brooding together, only the cross broilers prolapsed.That leads me to believe it is a breed issue rather than an environmental or feed issue. Whereas, after 10 years of raising freedom ranger broilers, I have never lost a single bird to health problems or broken legs.
I’m now able to provide a concluding comment to my earlier posting when I reported raising both WRs (21) and RRs (6) this year for the first time. My intent incidentally was never to appear critical or challenge the author’s experience!! I am simply trying to defend the WRs because I believe we all recognize that commercial production inevitably challenges the needs for good welfare (of any food production).
So I won’t repeat from my first posting but simply to conclude that my experiment came to an end today. Jun 2nd to Oct 16th was the period I raised the six Rustic Rangers. The article is correct, these birds cost more, are more work for plucking and need longer to get to a preferred weight. That said they have a great temperament, tolerate human contact well and also, critically in my case, can manage to co-exist well with the WRs especially over feed periods. They are not phased by the aggressive, competitive behaviours of the WRs when feeding.
So the scores –
White Rocks – 13 weeks averaged 8 pounds dressed carcass – 168 lbs total
Rustic Ranger – 19 weeks averaged 6.6 pounds (spread was 5-7)- 40lbs total
I don’t think my set up is ideal for the RR as they are confined to a run which soon depletes of vegetation. They do always appreciate kale etc as a supplement to the diet I detailed before.
The longer RR growing period was likely too long as we ended up with large fat deposits at all the same areas the WRs are prone too. I should mention the WRs finished a week earlier than earlier years even though the feed regiment was identical(?) Other producers reported the same phenomenon.
Health wise – no issues with either bird and 100% success in rearing. The WR rectal prolapse mentioned has never been a feature of our production and only one case of ‘flip over’, although I prefer to think it choked itself by gorging food.
So I conclude that the Rustic Ranger doesn’t fulfill our domestic production needs, even before we eat it!! As the article states – costs more, takes more time and requires more work with all the feathers. It’s a shame – these birds are a real treat to have around and I only wish we could better meet the enclosure needs to support the natural foraging behaviour which became very evident after the WRs were taken from the flock.